I too run FreeRADIUS servers. I've used radperf & eapol_test to do
performance testing & optimization: http://networkradius.com/radperf.html and
http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/
It's not the most user-friendly tool, but once dialed in they're easy to
run and script.

Mike Albano
UNLV




On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jorj Bauer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, it's encouraging to hear that other people feel our pain and have
> come to the same answers.
>
> -- Jorj
>
> --
> Jorj Bauer
> Manager of Engineering, Research and Development
> Information Systems and Computing, University of Pennsylvania
> 215.746.3850
> XMPP: [email protected]
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Joni Julian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > To test RADIUS, I've looked at
> http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3935211/5-Free-RADIUS-Testing-and-Monitoring-Tools.htm
> for options.
> >
> > We discovered our FreeRADIUS performance problems by being affected
> ourselves and checking Splunk for errors associated with our logins. When
> we first started with EAP-TTLS, we needed to spread the load across 6
> FreeRADIUS servers because we use kerberos, and the FreeRADIUS module for
> kerberos isn't multithreaded before FreeRADIUS 3.x (which didn't exist when
> we started adding servers to keep authentications from timing out). In
> terms of each server's load average, that stays low (often under 1%). So it
> wasn't a LOAD problem so much as a single-threaded bottleneck. We now have
> a script on Splunk to let us know if those errors crop up again, but I hope
> we'll use FreeRADIUS 3.x before that happens.
> >
> > - Joni
> > --
> > Joni Julian, Ph.D.
> > Associate Director of Networking,
> > Network Management Systems and Services
> > UNC ITS Networking
> >
> > On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Turner, Ryan H wrote:
> >
> >> We are using freeRadius and ran a large EAP-TTLS deployment prior to
> deprecating it in favor of EAP-TLS.  We did spread out our authentications
> across multiple servers on campus so that the load wouldn't swamp our
> servers.   We see around 60k wireless devices a day (max concurrent around
> 30k), and spread the load across 6 or 7 freeRadius servers.
> >>
> >> Ryan Turner
> >> Senior Network Engineer, ITS
> >> The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> >> +1 919 274 7926 Mobile
> >> +1 919 445 0113 Office
> >>
> >>> On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:32 AM, "Charles Rumford" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We are currently in the process of evaluating new RADIUS servers at
> the moment.
> >>> One of the problems we are having is coming up with a reliable and
> realistic way
> >>> of testing them to make sure that they are able to handle the load our
> wireless
> >>> network is going to throw at them.
> >>>
> >>> I was curious if anyone had any testing frameworks or methodologies
> they have
> >>> used in the past to test performance and conduct load testing on
> RADIUS servers.
> >>> I'm ultimately looking for a solution that simulates 802.1X
> EAP-TTLS/PAP
> >>> requests at the peak rate coming from our controllers.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Charles Rumford
> >>> Network Engineer/Senior Wireless Engineer
> >>> ISC Network Operations
> >>> University of Pennsylvania
> >>> OpenPGP Key ID: 0xF3D8215A
> >>> (p) 215-746-2808
> >>> (c) 267-398-7939
> >
> > **********
> > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to