We use a handful of Meraki APs in two locations. They work very well. We have had no major issues. The branch office scenario seems to be a popular use case for them, but I would add them to a list of solutions to evaluate for other purposes as well. You can call me if you would like.
Greg Briggs Network Manager Pacific Lutheran University 253-538-5666 On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Lee H Badman <[email protected]> wrote: > We have adopted Meraki as our branch solution of choice. We have sites > that use just Meraki APs, and others that use Meraki site-site VPN,LAN > switches, and APs. Generally quite content. > > > > Be happy to do a call if you’d like (rather than type out paragraphs). > > > > Lee Badman > > Wireless/Network Architect > > ITS, Syracuse University > > 315.443.3003 > > (Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com) > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Hunt > *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 12:23 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Meraki Evaluation > > > > We’re getting some evaluation Meraki APs shortly and I was wondering if > anyone had any information on how Meraki worked out for you; what trouble > you ran into (if any) or anything else you might want to share. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Jeremy Hunt > > *Network Analyst* > > *Lansing Community College* > > > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
