Thanks, Matt.

Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
(Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com)

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC 
reliability

Lee,
We have been using the HA 8510's since August. Early adopted 8.0 moved to 8.1 
and have had no issues thus far with roughly 1000 AP's. We still have some 
5508's for housing and auxiliaries. The addition of 10gig ports on the 8510's 
really helped on high volume. We took a look at the bowing after it was 
mentioned, our's Bow a bit as well.

Matt,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Lee H Badman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I saw the bowing thing- that’s insane. It makes me curious about the racks they 
are mounted in.

To date, do you see the advantages of the 8510 as outweighing the concerns?


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Williams, Matthew
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:46 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC 
reliability

Lee,
We’re going through this as we speak.  We’ve seen some issues with the 
controllers physically bowing.  We’ve also had issues with running HA via 
Layer-2 when upstream routing engines/supervisor cards fail.  Part of the issue 
is that there is very limited keep alive timer control in our version of code 
and the thresholds aren’t high enough to mitigate the route engines switching 
over.  Cisco recommends direct connecting them, so we’ve resorted to using 
switches as media converters for the direct connection.

The good news is that 8.0.100 reintroduced timer controls that did mitigate the 
failures when using Layer2 for the HA.  The bad news is that 8.0.100 caused 
watchdog failures in the 8510s.

Respectfully,

Matthew Williams
IT Manager, Wireless
Kent State University
Office: (330) 672-7246<tel:%28330%29%20672-7246>
Mobile: (330) 469-0445<tel:%28330%29%20469-0445>

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:35 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Looking for testimonials- 8510 vs 5508 WLC reliability

One more for the group: Having a large number of 5508s, I have an interest in 
greatly simplifying the environment by moving to higher capacity 8510s (zero 
interest in 5760s).

I’m hoping to hear from those that have taken the 8510 plunge. For us, outside 
of code issues, the 5508s have been solid hardware for us. Would like to know 
whether current 8510 users find them to be reliable as hardware, and whether 
the HA promises live up to the glossy.

Thanks-

Lee B.

Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003<tel:315.443.3003>
(Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com)



********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Matt O'Brien
Manager/Communications Engineer
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1249
Phone: (208) 426 4068
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to