Thanks for the details, Gertjan. Is helpful. -Lee
Lee Badman | Network Architect Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w its.syr.edu SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scharloo, Gertjan Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.120.0 (MR2) on 8510- good, bad? Importance: High Hi Lee, The 5 GHz radio message is a DFS problem and part of bug (CSCut98006)-and (CSCuq86269) CSCut98006 DFS detections due to high energy profile signature – AP2600/3600 specific fix Fixed in Image 8.0.110.22 for 3600/2600 platforms For 1700/2700/3700 will be coming soon, as there were some minor issues found during fix porting for this HW that are being resolved. This week Cisco should be able to confirm ETA for this second part of the fix (this is my TAC case SR 634977857 Flapping AP radio causing Alarms in Prime) Gertjan Scharloo ICT Consultant _____ Universiteit van Amsterdam | Hogeschool van Amsterdam ICT Services Leeuwenburg | kamer A9.36 Weesperzijde 190 | 1097 DZ Amsterdam +31 (0)20 525 4885 Mobiel : +31(0) 61013-5880 www.uva.nl<http://www.uva.nl/> uva.nl/profile/g.scharloo Beschikbaar : Ma | - | Wo | Do | Vr | Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Jess Walczak Verzonden: dinsdag 28 juli 2015 01:25 Aan: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.120.0 (MR2) on 8510- good, bad? Lee, I am also seeing what Scott is seeing with the nearly instantaneous radio resets on the 5Ghz side. It doesn't seem to affect any client experience, either, but it does generate a LOT of noise from a monitoring point of view. We have had a TAC open about this since February, but honestly haven't really done any hardcore troubleshooting of the issue once we ascertained that it was not affecting service in any real way. In Prime, I have it emailing a distribution group, and I get tons and tons of emails from the same exact time, one reading that the AP went down, and the other one reading that it came up, like so: __________________________________ PI has detected a change in one or more alarms of category AP and severity Critical in Virtual Domain ROOT-DOMAIN. The new severity of the following items is Clear: 1. Message: '802.11a/n' interface of AP 'OWS458-01-1142' associated to controller 'UST-WLC8510 (140.209.13.70)' is up. Failure Source: AP OWS458-01-1142, Interface 802.11a/n __________________________________ PI has detected one or more alarms of category AP and severity Critical in Virtual Domain ROOT-DOMAIN for the following items: 1. Message: '802.11a/n' interface of AP 'OWS458-01-1142' associated to controller 'UST-WLC8510 (140.209.13.70)' is down. Reason: Unknown Failure Source: AP OWS458-01-1142, Interface 802.11a/n __________________________________ In fact, here, the "all clear" message arrived before the one telling about the down event, and both are timestamped for 4:21PM. :-) Our environment is an 8510 HA pair running 8.0.120.0 for the larger campus with 900 or so APs, and an 5508 HA pair running 8.0.120.0 for the smaller campus with under 200 APs, and Prime 2.2. The AP models we have are 1242's, 1142's, 2702's (both i's and e's), and 702W's. Also, we are just now going live with ISE 1.4 as well. Jess Walczak Sr. Network Analyst University of St. Thomas Saint Paul, MN On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Scott McDermott <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: My environment is not on that scale, but I’m still seeing a lot of 5GHz radios cycling between up and down states followed by a reset, then it will come back up. Might happen again later, might not. Seems to be happening on all models. -- Scott McDermott Network & System Administrator King County Library System From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of Lee H Badman Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 06:03 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.120.0 (MR2) on 8510- good, bad? Hello to the group- for those of you who have moved to the Cisco-recommended 8.0.120.0 code, have you found any issues? Particularly big 8510 environments with thousands of APs per controller doing 802.1x/WPA2. Thanks- Lee Lee Badman | Network Architect Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003<tel:315.443.3003> f 315.443.4325<tel:315.443.4325> e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>w its.syr.edu<http://its.syr.edu> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu<http://syr.edu> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
