They should perform near identically. Well within the margin of error of whatever test you are doing.
Actually if you look at the specs, the RX sensitivity of the 2700 is better than the 3700. If you have a compelling use case for the module, go 3700. If you don't, go 2700. Thanks Jake Snyder [email protected] 208-286-3015 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 5, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Sullivan, Don <[email protected]> wrote: > > Our Cisco sales guy pretty much sold us our 2702s on those points because we > had initially requested the 3702s. I cannot tell you for sure if there is any > difference because we have not deployed 3702s. > > Don Sullivan > Network Administrator > 205-726-2111 > > From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Deshong, Kenneth > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 3:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Aironet Series > > I have a question that I hope someone can help me with. > > In the hope of saving money, my boss wants me to look at a cheaper > alternative to the 3702i in areas that might not need a top of the line > Access Point. In my comparison, I find the Aironet 2702i to have similar > specs minus the 4x4 radio. Both support 802.11ac, Client Link 3.0, CleanAir > 2.0. I don’t plan on using the Modular slot . > > I’ve read from limited sources that say the electrons are the same, and > performance is neck and neck. Can anyone debunk that? > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
