Thanks, Chris- that link is perfect for what I'm trying to see.

-Lee

Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+)
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w 
its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Adams (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

Lee,

We use Fortinet Fortigate appliances extensively with great success at handling 
P2P traffic.

As a whole, we generally block the entire FortiGuard P2P category (among 
others), and then whitelist legitimate applications higher in the policy set. 
Skype, Steam, and Battle.net are a few examples of P2P traffic that we do 
allow. I have also been slowly moving our traffic shaping efforts off of Blue 
Coat PacketShapers and onto our FortiGates with great success and simplified 
administration.

If you'd like to see what is encompassed in the FortiGuard P2P category, you 
can view it here: https://fortiguard.com/appcontrol

I'm sure that PA has similar features that you are already utilizing.


Thanks,

Chris Adams, CISSP

Director, Network & Telecom Services
Division of Information Technology
University of North Georgia
E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | Office: (706) 867-2891

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:29 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Top P2P apps as classified by shapers?

Apologies for the dual-posting for those who fall into that.

I'm wondering if those schools running Palo Alto boxes and the like might be 
willing to share what your appliances are classifying as the top 10-15 P2P apps 
seen these days, whether you choose to block/limit them or not? Just want to 
sanity check one of our methodologies, and a few outside views would be helpful 
if anyone feels like sharing that information.

Regards,

Lee Badman

Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+)
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244
t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w 
its.syr.edu
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu



********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to