?It's a bummer that HaLow and LoRa not quite ready yet- I'd rather have all of these things 100% out of WLAN space. I know we don't have the luxury of declaring 2.4 GHz dead and available by a long shot here.
Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+) Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w its.syr.edu SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu ________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> on behalf of Kees Pronk <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 1:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] IoT Devices Assuming that many IoT devices will be low bandwith and latency insensitive why not dedicate / donate the 2.4GHz spectrum to the IoT? -Kees Sent from my iPad On 6 sep. 2016, at 18:11, "Norton, Thomas (Network Services)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We just received our first request for a hue bridge lighting today, and have started to see other IoT request trickle in over the last few weeks requiring PoE, etc. Planning ahead, have any of you started looking at ways to support these request as they become more frequent? T.J. Norton Wireless Network Architect - Team Lead Network Operations - Wireless (434) 592-6552 [http://www.liberty.edu/media/1616/40themail/wordmark-for-email.jpg] Liberty University | Training Champions for Christ since 1971 ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. Disclaimer ( http://www.avans.nl/over-avans/e-mail-disclaimer ) ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
