DFS channels are really well supported on computers and phones released in the 
last two years or so, including the 2e band, and it's a pretty safe assumption 
that in another year or two DFS support for these devices will be a non-issue. 
Those that do have a problem are mostly 2e, though UNII2 isn’t too far behind. 
Many older phones lack any UNII2(e) support, and the three year old Nexus5 
(released about 3.5 years ago) that I just retired a few weeks ago didn’t 
support any DFS channels. 



For other devices, all bets are off. They’re just as likely not to support DFS 
as they are to support it and I don’t know if that will change any time soon. 


From: "Jason Cook" <[email protected]> 
To: "Chuck Enfield" <[email protected]>, "EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent 
Group Listserv" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 7:49:24 PM 
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5 GHz Only Admin WLAN 



A Good point. 



Are all DFS channels a problem for some clients or is it primarily in the 
UNII2e spectrum and the UNII2 is ok? I was understand the issue was with UNII2e 
only but don’t actually know 




-- 

Jason Cook 

Technology Services 

The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 

Ph : +61 8 8313 4800 





From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Enfield 
Sent: Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:26 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5 GHz Only Admin WLAN 




In response to, “ 2.4 GHz is seeming less and less like a thing to worry about, 
as most devices are already using 5GHz.” I’d caution that 5GHz is a big band, 
and few devices support every channel in it. If you want to get the most out of 
5GHz by enabling DFS channels, you have to give clients that don’t support a 
particular channel something to connect to. I can think of two ways to do that. 
1) You can provide overlapping 5GHz coverage, but that’s only reliable if your 
radio management is smart enough to ensure there’s a non-DFS channels available 
everywhere. I’m not sure any do that yet. 2) Dual-band clients in an area 
covered by a 5GHz channel they don’t support can use 2.4GHz if the SSID 
supports it. 



My recommendation is to leave 2.4GHz enabled if you use DFS channels. 



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ 
mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Steve Bohrer 
Sent: Friday, 14 April 2017 2:00 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5 GHz Only Admin WLAN 




Seems fine, but what's the big deal with having the 2.4 available? Are you 
trying to minimize the amount of (limited) 2.4 GHz bandwidth taken by beacons? 
Or do you just want to assure that the devices you care about don't 
inadvertently grab a slow 2.4 connection? 





We are way smaller than you guys, but just with Aruba doing its standard ARM 
stuff, typically less than 10 percent of our connected devices are on 2.4 GHz. 
The majority of these are are "registered" student devices that can't do 802.1x 
or 5GHz, mostly game machines. Of the rest, many seem to things that have 
hopped on our "guest" network but then not actually signed in at the portal. My 
assumption has been that these are phones in the pockets of the many 
non-Emerson people who walk by our buildings. 





So, 2.4 GHz is seeming less and less like a thing to worry about, as most 
devices are already using 5GHz. 





Steve 





On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Jason Cook < [email protected] > 
wrote: 




We run 3 SSID”s essentially doing the same thing but with one 5ghz only. It 
wasn’t targeted for devices where we have more control but as workaround to 
devices connecting at 2.4 when there’s a perfectly good 5ghz there. 



UofA 

UofA 5ghz 

eduroam 



However I don’t like the extra SSID. So the pencilled plan at this point is to 
disable 2.4Ghz on UofA, and remove the UofA 5ghz network. Anyone needing 2.4 
can use eduroam. That would be end of year, so we’ll see if it actually 
happens. 



We don’t advertise on our website anything about the 5ghz only network, so 
there’s no huge take-up which is ok as it wasn’t meant to be permanent. However 
it’s certainly done its job with users on it no longer having the issue of 
jumping back to 2.4 (including me). 




-- 

Jason Cook 

Technology Services 

The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 

Ph : +61 8 8313 4800 





From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: 
[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman 
Sent: Friday, 24 March 2017 11:21 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5 GHz Only Admin WLAN 





Existing SSID, turn off 2.4. 

Lee Badman (mobile) 



On Mar 23, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeffrey D. Sessler < [email protected] > 
wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN



Are you speaking about a separately named SSID, or looking to use an existing 
SSID and radius to steer those clients into a different “admin” network? 



Jeff 




From: " [email protected] " < 
[email protected] > on behalf of " [email protected] " < 
[email protected] > 
Reply-To: " [email protected] " < 
[email protected] > 
Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 1:13 PM 
To: " [email protected] " < [email protected] 
> 
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5 GHz Only Admin WLAN 





Wondering how many of you are running 5 GHz single-band WLAN for admin 
networks, where I’m assuming there is more control over device HW configs. I’m 
specifically contemplating it for an SSID where we use domain-joined laptops. 





Been there? Done that? Can you tell me about your t-shirt? 





Thanks- 





Lee 





Lee Badman | Network Architect 

Adjunct Instructor | CWNE #200 
Information Technology Services 
206 Machinery Hall 
120 Smith Drive 
Syracuse, New York 13244 


t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e [email protected] w its.syr.edu 


SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 
syr.edu 











********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 




********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 

BQ_END










-- 


Steve Bohrer 


IT Infrastructure, Emerson College 


617-824-8523 


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss . 


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Reply via email to