Marcelo, If windows 7 is just 4%, what is your highest percentage? Windows 10, or something else?
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Marcelo Maraboli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello David > > we did this last month and "secured" PEAP by minimizing the risk in > Windows 7 clients. > > We used this guide and it worked very well. > http://www.defenceindepth.net/2010/05/attacking-and-securing-peap.html > > We did not use "step 4" because it didn't leave the user ID in our AAA, > they were all "anonymous". > > We also studied every operating system that connected to our WIFI and > found out that Windows-7 is just 4%, so we hope this problem will die on > it's own. Windows 10 can use PAP-TTLS, even though that is another deal. > > > hope it helps. > > > best regards, > > > > On 7/10/17 3:55 PM, LaPorte, David wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has done a risk/benefit assessment of using > EAP-PEAP in your environment. If so, would you be willing to share? We have > a solid understanding of the security/usability tradeoffs that come with > PEAP, but were hoping to not re-invent the wheel :) > > Thanks, > Dave > > David [email protected] > > > > > > > ********** > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss. > > > > -- > *Marcelo Maraboli Rosselott* > Subdirector de Redes y Seguridad > Dirección de Informática > Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile > http://informatica.uc.cl/ > -- > Campus San Joaquín, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul > Santiago, Chile > Teléfono: (56) 22354 1341 > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
