I just looked at the IPSK video from CIsco here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deEv-aNXfL0
Not 100% sure ISE is required by the sound of the video. They say a radius serve such as ISE, and of course Cisco is going to try and sell you ISE. They are using two Cisco-AV-Pairs which are psk-mode=ascii and psk=<psk key>, along with MAC filtering and AAA override. You maybe able to pass those Cisco-AV-Pairs with any radius server. Kevin McCormick <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/3aa51624-4156-498d-bf6f-4a61790d54cf/public_url> Network Administrator University Technology - Western Illinois University [email protected] | (309) 298-1335 <3092981335> | Morgan Hall 106b Connect with uTech: Website <http://www.wiu.edu/utech> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/uTechWIU> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/WIU_uTech> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Jason Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a lot of resolved caveats in the 160 release for the 2800/3800 > series. We’ve only got a handful of 2800’s operational but a lot to be > installed, have hit 1 issue but haven’t identified it with a known bug yet. > > > > Despite showing “users connected” to an AP, new users couldn’t join. I > certainly couldn’t and you wouldn’t necessarily connect to a neighbouring > AP with strong signal. Rebooting the AP resolved it, came across it on 2 > out of 16 AP’s last week. Due to impact we couldn’t get right into > troubleshooting or logging a case, but intend to if it returns. Hopefully > it’s not on critically locate AP’s this time > > > > At this stage likely we’ll be testing and migrating to 8.2.160 (from > 8.2.151) in the next few weeks > > > > Was keen to begin playing with 8.5 with IPSK finally released, but am > disappointed with the requirement of ICE(we don’t use) or at least an > external radius server providing a not so simple implementation we were > hoping for. So that might be on the back burner L > > > > > > -- > > Jason Cook > > Technology Services > > The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 > > Ph : +61 8 8313 4800 <+61%208%208313%204800> > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Entwistle, Bruce > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 August 2017 4:16 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version > > > > I had seen the comments made by the group during the summer related to > bugs and the 2800 APs, so as a precautionary measure we did the upgrade. > > > > Bruce Entwistle > > Network Manager > > University of Redlands > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 11:26 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version > > > > Bruce, > > > > Was there anything that you were absolutely hitting, or are you doing the > “just in case” thing here? > > > > *Lee Badman* | Network Architect > > Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200) > Information Technology Services > 206 Machinery Hall > 120 Smith Drive > Syracuse, New York 13244 > > *t* 315.443.3003 <(315)%20443-3003> * f* 315.443.4325 <(315)%20443-4325> > *e* [email protected] *w* its.syr.edu > > *SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY* > syr.edu > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Entwistle, Bruce > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 2:11 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version > > > > We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning. The > primary reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 > APs. > > > > Bruce Entwistle > > Network Manager > > University of Redlands > > > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *James Helzerman > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 10:57 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version > > > > Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version are planning on > running for start of fall semester? > > > > At this point we looking at 8.2.151 possibly 8.2.160 but havent tested yet. > > > > Thanks > > > > -Jimmy > > > > -- > > James Helzerman > Wireless Network Engineer > University of Michigan - ITS > > Phone: 734-615-9541 <(734)%20615-9541> > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/ > discuss. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
