From the iPSK config guide at:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf

"IPSK can be configured on any AAA serer that supports Cisco av-pair." 

 -Sam

This email sent from a mobile computing device. Please excuse typos and brevity.

> On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:40 PM, Mccormick, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I just looked at the IPSK video from CIsco here.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deEv-aNXfL0
> 
> Not 100% sure ISE is required by the sound of the video.
> 
> They say a radius serve such as ISE, and of course Cisco is going to try and 
> sell you ISE.
> 
> They are using two Cisco-AV-Pairs which are psk-mode=ascii and psk=<psk key>, 
> along with MAC filtering and AAA override.
> 
> You maybe able to pass those Cisco-AV-Pairs with any radius server.
> 
> Kevin McCormick
> Network Administrator
> University Technology - Western Illinois University
> [email protected] | (309) 298-1335 | Morgan Hall 106b
> Connect with uTech: Website | Facebook | Twitter
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Jason Cook <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> There is a lot of resolved caveats in the 160 release for the 2800/3800 
>> series. We’ve only got a handful of 2800’s operational but a lot to be 
>> installed, have hit 1 issue but haven’t identified it with a known bug yet.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Despite showing “users connected” to an AP, new users couldn’t join. I 
>> certainly couldn’t and you wouldn’t necessarily connect to a neighbouring AP 
>> with strong signal. Rebooting the AP resolved it, came across it on 2 out of 
>> 16 AP’s last week. Due to impact we couldn’t get right into troubleshooting 
>> or logging a case, but intend to if it returns. Hopefully it’s not on 
>> critically locate AP’s this time
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> At this stage likely we’ll be testing and migrating to 8.2.160 (from 
>> 8.2.151) in the next few weeks
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Was keen to begin playing with 8.5 with IPSK finally released, but am 
>> disappointed with the requirement of ICE(we don’t use) or at least an 
>> external radius server providing a not so simple implementation we were 
>> hoping for. So that might be on the back burner L
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Jason Cook
>> 
>> Technology Services
>> 
>> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
>> 
>> Ph    : +61 8 8313 4800
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
>> Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 4:16 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I had seen the comments made by the group during the summer related to bugs 
>> and the 2800 APs, so as a precautionary measure we did the upgrade.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Bruce Entwistle
>> 
>> Network Manager
>> 
>> University of Redlands
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
>> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 11:26 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Bruce,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Was there anything that you were absolutely hitting, or are you doing the 
>> “just in case” thing here?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Lee Badman | Network Architect 
>> 
>> Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200)
>> Information Technology Services
>> 206 Machinery Hall
>> 120 Smith Drive
>> Syracuse, New York 13244
>> 
>> t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e [email protected] w its.syr.edu
>> 
>> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
>> syr.edu
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
>> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 2:11 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning.  The 
>> primary reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 
>> APs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Bruce Entwistle
>> 
>> Network Manager
>> 
>> University of Redlands
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
>> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:57 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi.  For those with Cisco access points what code version are planning on 
>> running for start of fall semester?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> At this point we looking at 8.2.151 possibly 8.2.160 but havent tested yet.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> -Jimmy
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> James Helzerman
>> Wireless Network Engineer
>> University of Michigan - ITS
>> 
>> Phone: 734-615-9541
>> 
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>> 
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>> 
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>> 
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>> 
>> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
> 
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Reply via email to