Couldn't have said it better myself.  That is exactly what we do.



*--Jeremy L. Gibbs*
Sr. Network Engineer
Utica College IITS

T: (315) 223-2383
F: (315) 792-3814
E: [email protected]
http://www.utica.edu

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Rob Harris <[email protected]>
wrote:

> While there are performance gains to be sure (by going to 40, or 80),
> there are other concerns as well. We use 20 in our dorms because of the
> density of APs and users, we need those additional channels (even with dfs
> in use). We use 40 in our public spaces when there’s adequate capacity for
> it, and 80 in our theater area since we designed for it.
>
>
>
> [image: The Culinary Institute of America]
>
>
> *Robert Harris **Manager of Network Services*
>
> *Culinary Institute of America*
>
> 1946 Campus Drive
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1946+Campus+Drive%0D+Hyde+Park,+NY+%0D+845&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Hyde Park, NY
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1946+Campus+Drive%0D+Hyde+Park,+NY+%0D+845&entry=gmail&source=g>
> 845-451-1681 <(845)%20451-1681>
>
> www.ciachef.edu
>
> *Food is Life*
>
> *Create and Savor Yours.™*
>
>
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey D. Sessler
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:20 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
>
>
>
> It’s surprising to me that anyone would purchase a Lamborghini, then
> disconnect ten of the twelve cylinders and drive it at 25 mph on the
> autobahn.
>
>
>
> When I see static 20 MHz channels, or using 40 MHz in only limited areas,
> I wonder what’s behind the purposeful neutering of the system. If you are a
> Cisco customer running 8.1 or above, and not using DBS (Dynamic Bandwidth
> Selection), then it’s the equivalent of the Lamborghini above running on
> only two cylinders.
>
>
>
> Don’t miss out on the significant advancements in bandwidth management.
> Free those resources spent doing point-in-time simulation and surveys for
> something the software doesn’t already do far better at. I promise, DBS
> won’t hurt a bit and your users will thank you a hundred times over.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"[email protected]" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of "Street, Chad A" <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 6:59 AM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
>
>
>
> What is your reasoning behind not wanting 40 megahertz channels if you
> have plenty of overhead with your channel utilization?  People saying you
> should or should not do something without Gathering any type of metric
> worry me.
>
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2017 3:28 PM, Chuck Enfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 1.      Enable it in places to check for radar events.  If you get few,
> then yes.  Client devices are almost fully capable now.  Hidden SSID’s are
> the only issue.  Some clients don’t probe on DFS channels, and will only
> respond to beacons.  Make sure 2.4 is usable for the small number of
> incompatible devices.
>
> 2.      No.  Don’t even consider 40MHz unless you’re using almost all the
> DFS channels, but even then you’ll probably have to disable it in some high
> density areas.
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *David Blahut
> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 3:17 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Two RF Questions
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have two hopefully simple RF related questions:
>
> 1.  Should I enable the extended UNII-2 channels campus wide?
>
> 2.  Should I enable 40Mhz channel width campus wide?
>
> In other words what are you doing on your campus and what is the "best
> practice?
>
>
>
> Our wireless infrastructure:
>
>
>
> 3 Cisco 5508s running 8.2.141.0
>
>
>
> 20 - 3800 APs
>
> 368 - 3700 APs
>
> 414 - 3600 APs
>
> 8 - 3500 APs
>
> 7 - 1810 APs
>
> 32 - 1142 APs
>
>
>
> Prime 3.1.0
>
>
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> David
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Reply via email to