1. I recommend Aruba as well.
2. The AP’s are rock solid, reasonably priced, and easy to set up.
3. I have had varying experiences with support, licensing, and with upgrades
(both good and bad).
4. I would ask why you have a requirement that the controller be cloud-based
in this section.
5. The 300 series supports both PoE.af and .at, adjusting AP capabilities as
Sr. Network Admin
Massasoit Community College
1 Massasoit Blvd
Brockton, MA 02302
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> On Behalf Of John Rodkey
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:10 PM
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options
Our college - about 40 buildings, 1200 students, 3500 wireless clients per day,
currently 310 WAPs - is considering a major upgrade in WAPs, replacing a number
that are 9 years old and no longer supported.
We could replace with the latest model of our existing vendor, but want to
consider all the feasible alternatives. We have a hard requirement that the
controller be cloud-based, the system deal well with Mac clients, understand
VLANs and an enterprise quality network, and have a rich set of configuration,
logging, monitoring, and troubleshooting tools for dealing both with clients
and access points. Responsive support is also required, and unsurprisingly
total system cost is a significant issue.
3 vendors come to mind: Meraki, Ubiquiti, and Aerohive.
1) do other vendors come to mind that play well in this space?
2) what are your positive experiences with any of the above?
3) what are your negative experiences?
4) have you recently gone through this analysis, and if so, what were your
5) what issues have you experienced with PoE capacity requirements with these
Director of Servers and Networks
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.