If someone could please do a packet capture of a reauthenticatjon and give me 
the Radius part with the AVP pairs, this would really help.

Ryan Turner
Head of Networking, ITS
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
+1 919 274 7926 Mobile
+1 919 445 0113 Office

On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Turner, Ryan H <rhtur...@email.unc.edu> wrote:


I really think Felix hit the nail on the head.  I found the documentation with 
the supported attributes for CoA and Cisco.  Type 55 (Event-Timestamp) is NOT a 
supported option.  We are getting NAKs back stating that we are sending an 
‘Unsupported Attribute’.  I am asking Extreme how to strip 55 out of the CoA.  
In the meantime, I have also asked the other institution to look at their 
configs and validate 3799.

Ryan

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:03 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)

We use 1700 as well for our CoA stuff against the Cisco 8540 with PacketFence.

________________________________
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Turner, Ryan H 
<rhtur...@email.unc.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:01 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)


I reversed that.  The standard is 3799, and I know Cisco tends to use 1700.  
But I see plenty of documentation on 3799 for Cisco.  I’ll confirm.



From: Turner, Ryan H
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:00 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)



So apparently that changed.  If you search on Cisco, you will note that they 
seemed to go away from the default port.  I do not think we would be getting a 
properly formatted NAK if we were sending to the wrong port.  But I am going to 
ask the other institution to validate that.



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
On Behalf Of Abhiramms
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 11:25 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)



Ryan,



Have you tried UDP port 1700.

As far as I can remember, the default port when adding a radius client for a 
cisco device was 1700.



Also - I usually refer to this link that has the different CoA pcaps captured 
from a cisco perspective:



https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1wYJhxkCoessGu03O__77cLWEJokBWJt9?usp=sharing



Source - 
https://wirelesslywired.com/2018/01/18/deconstructing-the-radius-coa-process/



Thanks

Abhi



On Apr 17, 2020, at 8:07 AM, Turner, Ryan H 
<rhtur...@email.unc.edu<mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:



Thank you Felix.  We do have this attribute present.  Let me see if I can get 
it removed.



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
On Behalf Of Felix Windt
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:52 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)



This is off the cuff, but in the past I’ve had issues with Cisco WLCs taking 
CoAs when the Event-Timestamp attribute was present.



thx,

felix



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of "Turner, Ryan H" 
<rhtur...@email.unc.edu<mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Friday, April 17, 2020 at 9:26 AM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of 
Authorization)



We currently use Extreme Network Access Control.  We have had this for 14 years 
and it works very well.  We integrated it with Aruba wireless years ago, and we 
are able to send back filter IDs on the initial authentication to change roles, 
as well as issue disconnects to the user, forcing them to reauthenticate to 
their new policy (for example, a user is online and doing something bad, we 
send a disconnect message to the controllers and the user reconnects and 
authenticates with the new role).



We are now having to integrate with another institutions Cisco wireless 
controllers.  We have the authentication stuff working great.  But we are 
unable to get the disconnect/CoA to work.  We believe we have the correct 
format (xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx) and we are utilizing the correct port for 3587 (I 
think it is UDP 3799 off the top of my head).  We are getting back NAKs, and 
the message indicated is ‘invalid attributes’.  We aren’t sure what attributes 
to send back for the disconnect.  Obviously the other third party NACs have to 
do this correctly, but I’ve been unable to find documentation.  Extreme has 
some old documentation, but it appears wrong.  Any experts out there on this?  
Anyone willing to do a reauthentication from their NAC to their controllers and 
send us the packet trace?  If we know what attributes you are sending, that is 
likely what we need to make this work.



I’ve opened a ticket to Extreme, and I’ve asked the other institution to open a 
ticket with Cisco.  But this may get me results quicker.



Thanks!



Ryan Turner

Head of Networking

Communication Technologies | Information Technology Services

r...@unc.edu<mailto:r...@unc.edu>

+1 919 445 0113 (Office)

+1 919 274 7926 (Mobile)



**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at 
https://www.educause.edu/community<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fcommunity&data=02%7C01%7Cfelix.windt%40DARTMOUTH.EDU%7Cc9e908903f6e46cf822108d7e2d2f0fb%7C995b093648d640e5a31ebf689ec9446f%7C0%7C0%7C637227267926747319&sdata=WnCm87U42oIY9FHU8F3T0OteowYT3ihSRQQd9h92%2F5Y%3D&reserved=0>

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

**********
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community

Reply via email to