On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM Bjoern A. Zeeb <b...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > That looks a bit disappointing. Not that I can claim to really understand > > most of it. > > compat.linuxkpi.80211.wlan0.dump_stas: > > lsta 0xfffff80001333000 sta 0xfffff800013331c0 added_to_drv 1 > > nl80211_sta_info (valid fields) > > 0x00004503<BEACON_RX,BEACON_SIGNAL_AVG,SIGNAL_AVG,RX_BITRATE,TX_BITRATE> > > connected_time 0 inactive_time 0 > > rx_bytes 0 rx_packets 0 rx_dropped_misc 0 > > rx_duration 0 rx_beacon 16464 rx_beacon_signal_avg -46 > > tx_bytes 0 tx_packets 0 tx_failed 0 > > tx_duration 0 tx_retries 0 > > signal 0 signal_avg -47 ack_signal 0 avg_ack_signal 0 > > You have good singal. > > > generation 0 assoc_req_ies_len 0 chains 0 > > rxrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2 > > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_gi 0 > > txrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2 > > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_g > > > You are on VHT80 with MCS 9 NSS 2 with Short Guard Interval (SGI). > That's the maximum possible on VHT80. That should give you 3-500Mbit/s > RX locally as single user. At least others have reported that. > > It'll be a few seconds before the firmware will fully ramp up to use > that but it seems you managed. > > Hard to say what's going wrong without much further debugging. > > What kind of speedtest were you using? > Ookla speedtest between Livermore, Cal and Comcast in San Francisco. Used the same endpoints and software for both tests. Do you have any chance to test a local target? > I'll try putting iperf3 on my server. It's hard wired to my router, so any issues should be on my system > > /bz > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7 > -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
