I think the issue has to do with how you've calculated the message integrity check. A new version of the spec clarifies the fields over which the MIC is to be calculated. It's available at:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IEEE/draft-congdon-radius-8021x-18.txt Let me know if this fixes the problem > Message: 9 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:38:35 +0800 > Subject: [BAWUG] Re: Info on 802.1X key usage > > > Hi, > > After reading the draft-congdon-radius-8021x-18.txt , > I try to setup the environment and sniff the packet. > But I find there's something wrong with my test. > The signature I generated is not the same as the one > generated by Cisco AP350. I will describe my procedure > in the following. -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
