> As for the different levels of encryption that Metaframe provides I do > not know what the differences are. I have used Windows NT/2000 terminal > services which is based on the Citrix code (I believe?) and have had > good luck tunneling it over ssh with the "High" encryption that Terminal > Services provides enabled.
How mature is the citrix scheme? If it's a proprietary, non peer reviewed cryptosystem, I would agree with the above and tunnel it through something that is open and peer reviewed like ssh-2. Particularly of interest in a wireless network is key exchange. I might consider something using diffie-hellman somewhat safe over wireless. But just to be sure, ssh tunneling, or ssl with key rotation is probably the way to go. tack -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
