In the article quoted below, it says:
"Meanwhile, 802.11b carries data at 54 Mbps and already has an estimated 
15 million connections in the United States alone"
Did something change that I didn't catch, or is this a typo and really 
meant 802.11a?

Sameer

-- 
Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
Asst. Professor of Information Systems
San Francisco State University
San Francisco CA 94132 USA
http://verma.sfsu.edu/ 



John E. Kreznar wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>   ACM TechNews is intended as an objective news digest for busy IT
>   Professionals. Views expressed are not necessarily those of either
>   HP or ACM.
>
>   To send comments, please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Volume 4, Issue 409: Wednesday, October 9, 2002
>
>     * "Being Wireless"
>
>       Wired (10/02) Vol. 10, No. 10, P. 116; Negroponte, Nicholas MIT
>       Media Lab founder Nicholas Negroponte predicts wireless 802.11
>       systems will transform telecommunications from a centralized,
>       proprietary mesh of networks to one that is open and free to
>       most users. Although phone companies are pursuing 3G technology
>       as the future for wireless data transmission, Negroponte points
>       out that 3G is still more applicable to voice applications and
>       will carry just 1 Mbps in two years. Meanwhile, 802.11b carries
>       data at 54 Mbps and already has an estimated 15 million
>       connections in the United States alone. While 802.11 only
>       carries for about 1,000 feet unamplified, Negroponte says that
>       peer-to-peer technology will eventually allow for a robust,
>       free network that can largely bypass links to the traditional
>       Internet. He points out that as more individual nodes are
>       linked to one another via peer-to-peer, the quality and
>       capabilities of the network are increased, unlike traditional
>       networks, where more users means less bandwidth. Moreover, the
>       technology is becoming cheaper and more functional, and special
>       antennas can send signals further than 20 kilometers so that
>       far-flung communities can also be hooked up. In the end, the
>       traditional telecommunications infrastructure will be forced to
>       recognize the strength of this new network and authorities
>       reorganize spectrum accordingly, so that it is owned commonly
>       and not parceled out to be used with less effectiveness.
>       http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/wireless.html
>
>   Copyright 2002 Information, Inc. This service may be reproduced for internal
>   distribution.
>
>- -- 
> John E. Kreznar [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9F1148454619A5F08550 705961A47CC541AFEF13
>                    No truckle to any body politic
>  Imagine there's no countries / to kill or die for  --John Lennon, 1971
>     Disavowal of political allegiance is prerequisite to freedom.
> 
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
>
>iD8DBQE9qCyEYaR8xUGv7xMRAoWpAJ46gnvKWm62z4dWX4WnmUQR5NVGGwCeNIfM
>g3IGFX0RCBJVsFVNbCv4tNo=
>=tAZ7
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>--
>general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
>[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  
>

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to