On Sunday, Nov 3, 2002, at 12:05 US/Central, Paul Traina wrote:
Speaking of this, do people have a good comparison/contrast between using straight 802.11 in the classic community access-point fashion vs using 802.11 in the Locust mesh fashion? I'm trying to figure out what the mesh network's value add is supposed to be? Shouldn't I be able to configure a classic access point to act as a repeater?
Tim Pozar wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 07:08:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi: Just joined and wanted to say, hi.
Any suggestion for the most compelling argument for community based wireless networks out there? I'd like a general overview and article to start with.
A *really* general and short article is one I wrote some time back for ZDTV. You can find it at:http://www.lns.com/papers/nans101/ Tim -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
-- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
