Perhaps the appropriate response is much (much) lower tx power/EIRP for devices that don't implement
said "spectrum etiquette"

In my mind, TPC is at least as, if not more important than DFS.

In addition, there can be little debate that the largest percentage of users will be 802.11(a) in that band,
anything that favors things that aren't 802.11a is "unfair" to the majority of the users in that band.

jim

On Monday, Nov 25, 2002, at 11:50 US/Pacific, David P. Reed wrote:

At 05:04 PM 11/21/2002 -0800, Tim Pozar wrote:
I am cross posting this from another list as Mr. Leary makes a good
point (even though it is a bit of a plug for Alvarion's BreezeACCESS
boxes).    Not all unlicensed (aka license-exempt, non-licensed,
etc.) is "WiFi" / 802.11.  The press is confusing the IEEE protocol
with "unlicensed wireless".  BAWUG has never said that 802.11 is
the only way to go.  We should be using the right size hammer for
the job.  802.11 is just one tool in the box.
One of the scariest things in this regard is that Microsoft has been arguing that in the U-NII band we need to create a "MAC layer" or "spectrum etiquette" that will control and manage all users of the unlicensed band. What they seem to have in mind is something like Listen-Before-Talk and Dynamic Frequency Selection, though they have not revealed to me what they are proposing.

They have had success on The Hill getting language put in drafts of bills from Hollings and Boxer to require the FCC to put a spectrum etiquette in place on the 5 GHz unlicensed bands. This would effectively require some portion of 802.11 protocol to be the basis for ALL users of those bands.

I personally think this is technically a *bad idea* which will turn all unlicensed 5 GHz band into a band controlled by a single industry association (the WiFi association).. So the confusion may be even more damaging.

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Reply via email to