Hi, It is based on the same hardware design as the WET11, but with completely different firmware.
Regards, Chris. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nigel Ballard To: Chris Waters ; Roy Harvey ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: RE: [BAWUG] Wireless Sniffer Recommendations Why does this unit look so much like a Linksys WET11? Nigel Ballard Joejava Wireless Consultancy [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.joejava.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Waters Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 5:15 PM To: Roy Harvey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Wireless Sniffer Recommendations Hi, Have a look at the WSP100 Remote 802.11 Sensor from Network Chemistry. www.networkchemistry.com. It would be a little pointless that I give any recommendations, since I am a little biased. However, I do believe that the WSP100 offers the best value on the market for 802.11 packet capture. Regards, Chris. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Harvey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:21 PM Subject: [BAWUG] Wireless Sniffer Recommendations > All -- > > I'm interested in recommendations (or warnings) about products or best > practices for diagnosing Wireless LAN trouble (capture, decode, > troubleshoot, etc...). Are there good stand-alone solutions? > > Thanks, > > Roy > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
