Hello SJ, At 100' antenna are optional...
-- Best regards, evilbunny mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Louis picked up the apple, which was really Mrs. Gorf, and ate it. http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom Tuesday, December 17, 2002, 8:14:12 PM, you wrote: RRBS> I am setting up a short bridge between two houses that are across the street RRBS> from each other. I want to use a WET11 with a 14.5 dbi panel antenna on the RRBS> far side and perhaps a WAP11 on the master end. The distance between the two RRBS> houses is approximately 100 feet. RRBS> At these distances, and with a 14.5 on the slave side of the bridge, can I RRBS> get away without putting an antenna on the WAP11? RRBS> More importantly, can somebody comment about using an antenna on a RRBS> dual-antenna diversity system like the WAP11? Can I keep the rubber duck on RRBS> one side while running a cable to a 14.5 on the other side? I remember RRBS> having difficulty doing this with the diversity antennas on a SMC2655 but RRBS> that was a hack. RRBS> Is there a better AP out there that supports an external antenna, closed RRBS> network (no SSID) and power over ethernet for about the same price? RRBS> Blackrobe RRBS> -----Original Message----- RRBS> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RRBS> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Fleishman RRBS> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:07 PM RRBS> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RRBS> Subject: [BAWUG] Re: Linksys Wireless-G RRBS> Julian Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/16/02 at 12:00 PM wrote: >>How long before we start seeing triple standard a/b/g NICs and APs? I >>suspect those are the products we really want. Or will g win out and a/b >>just fade away? (remembering that all g products should interop with b >>products) RRBS> I'm going to sound like a smarty-pants, but these will really be dual-band, RRBS> dual-standard devices. 802.11g incorporates 802.11b backwards compatibility, RRBS> so an a/g device will do 802.11, 802.11a, 802.11b, and 802.11g (but probably RRBS> not TI's 802.11b+). So "g" products will interop, but they won't be labeled RRBS> b except in some marketing sense. The Wi-Fi Alliance will just be labeling RRBS> these things under their current plans as "2.4 GHz band," but they're going RRBS> to have to solve b versus g issues for clarity. RRBS> TI will be shipping in volume in April their a/b/draft g/WPA/draft e/AES RRBS> chipsets, so we'll certainly see robust equipment before June, but maybe as RRBS> soon as March or April. RRBS> -- RRBS> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> RRBS> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless RRBS> -- RRBS> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> RRBS> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
