Yes, 802.1x is a great idea, but it's hard to find Free clients (for
Windows 95/98 users)  Why not go with some form of web-based captive
portal (NoCat), combined with a FreeRADIUS authentication RADIUS server?
(like we're currently using)

If this is something you'd be interested in working together on, I'd be
more than happy to help/share ideas.  We're currently working on a free
"Global" authentication server, where communities would each run a copy
of the software, and it would allow users to roam freely between
communities (with one login and one password).  The user databases would
be "shared" between communities.

www.nextechwireless.net

If you're a developer, or would be interested in helping with the
project, please drop me an E-mail off-list.

           Thanks,

            Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of visakhae
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:08 AM
To: 'Jacques Caron'; 'MAILING LIST Bawug WIRELESS'
Subject: [BAWUG] What are Requirements for AP to support 802.1x/EAP
Authentication ?


Hello All,

         To Jacques: Hi, thanks a lot for ur answers on dynamic key
mapping and Host based AP and firmware based AP.

 Please can anyone suggest me the following:

                If an AP is to be built, then what are the essential
requirements that it has to support in order to be able to support
802.1x/EAP-Types(TLS,
MD5)
Authentications with RADIUS server as the Authentication server.

Actually what mechanism is to be followed for the 802.1x/EAP-TLS
authentication using RADIUS. This scenario is being followed in two
different ways.

   Approach 1: The RADIUS server passes two keys to AP through
MS-MPPE-Send-Key and MS-MPPE-Recv-key. These are the Session-Key and the
Signing-key. The AP then sends two EAPOL-key messages (one EAPOL-Key
message with empty key field for specifying that the session key derived
is during EAP Authentication is the Unicast_Session-Key, and second
EAPOL-Key message with the the
broadcast-key(static/dynamic) which
is Signed with the Signing-key and Encrpyted using the Session-Key.

   Approach 2: The RADIUS server passes one key to AP using
MS-MPPE-Send-Key attribute in the Access-Accept Radius packet. The one
key sent is the Session-Key. The AP then sends two EAPOL-key messages
(one EAPOL-Key message with empty key field for specifying that the
session key derived is during EAP Authentication is the
Unicast_Session-Key, and second EAPOL-Key message with the the
broadcast-key(static/dynamic) which is both
Signed and Encrpyted using the Session-Key.


Which is the better Approch to be followed so that the AP is compliant
with
   i) most of the or with the standard RADIUS servers that support
802.1x/EAP-Types(TLS, MD5) Authentication
  ii) the WLAN Client products available in the market that support
802.1x/EAP-Types(TLS, MD5) Authentication
      [Do the client WLAN products require to support the
802.1x/EAP-Types(TLS, MD5) Authentication? ]

Please explain me on this.
Thanks in advance.

regards,
Visakha.


************************************************************************
***
This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) 
and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. It may contain  privileged or confidential information 
and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for 
what it is intended. 

If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator
immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified
that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or
disclosing the contents of this message. 
FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from 
the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage
from virus.
************************************************************************
***
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to