I think the IETF needs to be involved. If not immediately then at least I think that any plans need to incorporate a plan to involve the IETF to integrate what is intended with the internet protocol. A few people have already emailed me to tell me that IPv6 is not deployed, is not being used, isn't even finalized yet... It surprised me but seems to be true actually. It's hypothetically possible that if someone develops a plan that involves IPv6, that accommodations in IPv6 might be made to support that.

simon

On Saturday, April 5, 2003, at 03:31 AM, Julian Bond wrote:

It looks to me like WIANA was created by Locustworld because they had to have something. It's not a general solution, it's a kludge but for now it does work. Jon has said that they were unable to get a suitable IPv4 block allocated to them. He's also said that they couldn't get a suitable IPv6 block allocated either. If this is all true, and I have no reason to doubt him, then the current system is broken and cannot cope with the new Meshed WLAN architecture.

So how to move this forward? I can understand an IETF view that there is nothing new here and the existing protocols handle the situation. Therefore there's no need for any IETF work. I can also understand the frustration because the current social-political way of implementing those protocols doesn't allow for the new situation. Expecting ICANN to pay attention to this is likely a non-starter given their current disarray. Particularly when the people and groups pushing back this boundary are small and/or loose confederations of programmers.

--
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel

--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to