On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:11:32PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote:
> Worse, the FCC-regulations excuse is, IMHO, highly dubious. It is *so
> easy* to generate interference; you can generate huge swaths of highly
> illegal interference with $1.50 worth of off-the-shelf components, like
> PLL's or even Schmitt triggers. In fact, anything that can be made to
> oscillate at RF speeds, is a potential interference-generator.

  Right, but nobody is going to accidentally put together an interference
  generator. Already, people are doing it with open source and
  802.11. Just for instance, lot of people think that it is a pretty good
  idea to turn their Prism cards up to 11, and it's EASY to do with Linux.

> I can only guess that either the FCC needs to lighten
> up a bit, or, the manufacturers need to stop hiding behind the FCC in
> order to acheive their nefarious lock-the-customer-in ends.

  The FCC has lightened up. If you certify under SDR rules, the FCC
  relaxes the requirements for getting your device re-approved after
  software mods, provided that end-users cannot modify the software
  at will.  Maybe Atheros and Broadcom think that this is an attractive
  feature for their customers, more attractive than open-source drivers.
  I guess that it could hasten product releases and updates.

  Soon we will see low-cost a/b/g radio chipsets from Taiwan. The
  Taiwanese makers have been pretty good about leaking datasheets to
  open-source that describe all the precious little knobs and dials
  for tuning and Tx power control, the stuff that the Atheros Hardware
  Abstraction Layer conceals. So ultimately there will be "purely"
  open-source a/b/g drivers.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to