Our own 802.11b is 24dBm at the antenna port of the ODU and real 11Mbps
sensitivity of -85dBm (system wide, not just the chip), which is a full 2
dBm better than SmartBridges  (11Mbps has -83dBm sensitivity and 1Mbps has
-92dBm per their data sheet
http://www.smartbridges.com/new/products/appo.php). I don't see any
"threshold sensitivity" numbers listed for SmartBridges

As for OFDM, the average sensitivity at 6Mbps specific to the BreezeACCESS
VL is -92dBm with a minimum number of -88dBm at 6Mbps.

- Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: Ivan Korshun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BAWUG] 802.11b Long Range non line of sight


line of sight 802.11b,

L=64km, 11M, transfer 492KBYTE/sec (FTP) !!!!!!!!!!!!!

DSSS device like SmartBridges
have threshold sensitivity Rx = -102dBm.

What threshold sensitivity devices OFDM ?


-Ivan

> 
> Fair enough Jim. I'll relate details once provided by customers. Until
then,
> here is one such paper though that does provide some math and photos
> relative to trials of some of our OFDM early on.
>
http://www.alvarion-usa.com/RunTime/Materials/KnowledgePoolFiles/alv_OFDM%20
> wp.pdf
> 
> - Patrick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:14 AM
> To: Patrick Leary
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [BAWUG] 802.11b Long Range non line of sight
> 
> You're making my point, but may not understand 'why'.  Some of the
> deployment
> scenerios you describe are extremely difficult, and changing
> modulation may not be enough (heavy understatement).
> 
> I only became sarcastic when you started asserting some 'magic' to
> OFDM over single-carrier (or spreading) systems.  Most technologies
> have trade-offs.  OFDM deals well with delay spread up to the limit of
> the GI, and then it fails due to massive, overwhelming ISI.
> 
> RF is physics.  Physics is mostly math.  Modulation is math.  You
> offered emperical data as 'proof', but proofs require mathematics.
> 
> Being completely open, I'm sure your product works in an interesting
> number of scenerios.  Really.  I hope you sell a ton.
> 
> But in the end propagation is physics, and "you canno violate the laws
> of physics, captian."
> 
> The emperical data you've offered are short textual descriptions of
> deployments.  I'm interested either in the modeling (or measurements)
> that show your product works, or in the actual data from the
> deployments you describe.
> 
> OK?
> 
> Jim
> 
> Patrick Leary writes:
> > All things "fail" when used beyond their capabilities and/or intent, so
I
> > don't regard such things as failures of the technology so much as
failure
> of
> > the human implementing it. For example, would you be the type to drive a
> car
> > into a lake, then call the car's inability to reach the other side a
> failure
> > of the product?
> >
> > Jim, the larger point is that your sarcasm is unwanted and unwarranted.
I
> > see now how you respond once your intellectual arguments themselves
fail.
> > You switch to personal insult. Accordingly, my dialogue with you has
> ended.
> > Enjoy your "last word" - no doubt you are the kind who must have it.
> >
> > - Patrick Leary
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:56 AM
> > To: Patrick Leary
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [BAWUG] 802.11b Long Range non line of sight
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm sure you have many successful deployments.  I'm sure your products
> > are all winners, and your shareholders think you walk the earth in
> > peace.
> >
> > I'm interested in where things fail(ed), and 'why'.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > Patrick Leary writes:
> > > Fair enough, so here is a list of a few of the areas where we tested
> > and/or
> > > have implemented OFDM in scaled deployments so far:
> > > - extremely urban-type low building density of a major city in South
> > America
> > > - heavily foliated coastal hills, across bays, and urban settings in
New
> > > Zealand
> > > - low mountains with heavy deciduous tree coverage in rural western
> > Maryland
> > > - coastal Southern California with little vegetation
> > > - flat arid, with marginal density in the Texas Panhandle
> > > - heavily foliated and urban landscapes in Hungary
> > > - deep in the very heavy coniferous high mountains in rural British
> > Columbia
> > > in Canada
> > > - an urban landscape in the Russian steps
> > >
> > > I'd say this is a fairly strong cross section of environments. Have
any
> > more
> > > negatives you might like to guess about on things you have never seen?
> > >
> > > Patrick Leary
> > > Alvarion
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jim Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:41 AM
> > > To: Patrick Leary
> > > Cc: 'Tim Pozar'; Ladjicke Diouf; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [BAWUG] 802.11b Long Range non line of sight
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Empirical data can only demonstrate results in the environment you
> > > studied.
> > >
> > > Proofs require mathematics.
> > >
> > > Patrick Leary writes:
> > > > Tim, I am not sure if you are talking about OFDM or DSSS. With OFDM,
> you
> > > > DON'T need LOS. Of course its not going to connect forever with
NLOS,
> > but
> > > > for a few miles, it is a no brainer. We have ample empirical data
that
> > > > proves it.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tim Pozar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:27 PM
> > > > To: Ladjicke Diouf
> > > > Cc: Patrick Leary; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [BAWUG] 802.11b Long Range non line of sight
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:26:26PM -0700, Ladjicke Diouf wrote:
> > > > > Can somebody shed some light on how OFDM helps NLOS, I thought it
> was
> > > just
> > > >
> > > > > a coding scheme like DSSS for 802.11b
> > > >
> > > > You still need LOS.  OFDM of DSSS will handle interference (ie.
> > > > "smearing" ) of the signal better with the lower symbol rate.
Things
> > > > like multipath will be less of an issue.  Still an issue, but less
> > > > pronounced.
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > > > --
> > > >   Snail: Tim Pozar / LNS / 1978 45th Ave / San Francisco CA 94116 /
> USA
> > > >                POTS: +1 415 665 3790  Radio: KC6GNJ / KAE6247
> > > >    "Be who you are and say what you feel because the people who mind
> > > >     don't matter and the people who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > > > ********
> > > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> > > > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> > computer
> > > > viruses.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > > > ********
> > > > --
> > > > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> > > > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure."
> > >                     -- Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > > ********
> > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> > > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer
> > > viruses.
> > >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > > ********
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure."
> >                       -- Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)
> >
> >
> >
> > This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > ********
> > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer
> > viruses.
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > ********
> > --
> > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> 
> --
> "Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure."
>                         -- Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)
> 
> 
> 
> This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
> 
>
****************************************************************************
> ********
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
****************************************************************************
> ********
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
 
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to