On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:06:59PM -0700, J?rgen Botz wrote:
> Tim Pozar wrote:
> >Huh?  Where does the FCC restrict the software drives the chipset?
> >Can you quote the section of CFR 47 on this?
> 
> I was only quoting the README from the driver:
> 
>    The FCC requires that a software-defined radio cannot be configured
>    by a user to operate outside the approved power levels and
>    frequency channels.  This makes it difficult to open-source code
>    that enforces limits on the power levels, frequency channels and
>    other parameters of the radio transmitter.  See 
> <http://ftp.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01264.pdf>
> 
> In the PDF file you'll find this:
> 
>    We are also adopting rules to permit electronic labeling of software
>    defined radios and to require manufacturers to take steps to prevent
>    unauthorized software modifications [...]
> 
> Taking steps to prevent "unauthorized modifications" is rather anti-Open 
> Source.

Hmmm... I wasn't thinking that this chipset is considered an SDR
but by the very loose definition in CFR 47 Part 2.1 Terms and
definition...

  2.1 Terms and definition.

  (c) Software defined radio. A radio that includes a transmitter
  in which the operating parameters of frequency range, modulation
  type or maximum output power (either radiated or conducted) can
  be altered by making a change in software without making any
  changes to hardware components that affect the radio frequency
  emissions.

And of course here is the rule on what software can be loaded up
on these radios...

  2.932 Modification of equipment.

  (e) Manufacturers must take steps to ensure that only software
  that has been approved with a software defined radio can be loaded
  into such a radio.  The software must not allow the user to operate
  the transmitter with frequencies, output power, modulation types
  or other parameters outside of those that were approved.
  Manufacturers may use authentication codes or any other means to
  meet these requirements, and must describe the methods in their
  application for equipment authorization.

But this is interesting...

  2.944 Submission of radio software

  The grantee or other party responsible for compliance of a software
  defined radio, or the applicant for authorization of a software
  defined radio shall submit a copy of the software that controls
  the radio frequency operating parameters upon request by the
  Commission.  Failure to comply with such a request within 14 days
  or such additional time as the Commission may allow may be cause
  for denial of authorization, forfeiture 1.80 of this chapter, or
  other administrative sanctions.

It would be interesting to see if the FCC starts to routinely ask
for code.  Could folks file FOIA's to get the code? :-)

Tim
-- 
  Snail: Tim Pozar / LNS / 1978 45th Ave / San Francisco CA 94116 / USA
               POTS: +1 415 665 3790  Radio: KC6GNJ / KAE6247
   "Be who you are and say what you feel because the people who mind
    don't matter and the people who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to