I've verified the claims, but, ya know, I'm basically a vendor, so YMMV.
Being a vendor doesn't necessarily make you bad. You are only bad if you are an evil vendor bent on market domination at all costs. (BWAAHAHAHAHAHA <evil market-dominating laugh). Market domination by virtue of providing better service at a lower cost could be seen as positive.
I am looking for more substantive information about not only receiver sensitivity but also selectivity and noise/unwanted-signal rejection. Which radio is going to work best in a wide coverage environment, e.g. a centralized AP, and which will work best in a point-to-point environment using directional antennas. In the latter case the off-axis rejection reduces noise and undesired signal admittance so sensitivity is more important than selectivity.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax GMT-4
-- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
