Hi everybody ! greetings from Colombia, southamerica

I work on my own isp company. After a few experience with d-link, linksys, 
planet (anyone else that me knows this brand ?), i'm thinking about 
entering the wisp market.

I've tested Linksys wap11 and d-link dwl-900ap+. I've also used Planet 
wap-1960. They're all 802.11b devices. All of them work in 4 or 5 modes 
(AP, ap client, bridge, multi-bridge and repeater). Some are better, some 
are worse.

I would like to hear your recomendations for this radios or any other you 
know i can use. I live in Colombia. I don't plan to use wireless 
access for users as only a very small minority have laptops and even less 
people have wireless cards. I know that's kind of normal now in USA but 
not here and won't be that way in very, very long time. I plan to use 
wireless for "linking" my zones. I will deploy AP's in heavily densed 
areas and will run utp to the users (i'�ve been doing this for a long 
time now except for the wireless link).

So, my radios will be mainly used in (AP-Ap client mode) in any link or 
(bridge-bridge) or (bridge-multi_bridge). It's not designed for users 
roaming around with their laptops. I plan on use 16 db VAGI antennas and 
one 12 db omni antennas. My links will be about 0.7 and 2 miles (the 
longest one). I don't plan on having all zones go to the omni antennas. 
Some zones must arrive to some "wireless hubs" which will have a 
"wireless uplink" to the main zone.

Fortunately here there aren't 2.4 Ghz phones. They're too expensive for 
most of the people. Also, in this city there are plenty of places for 
setting up the antennas.

Thanks for any recomendations you can give me. I can't afford Cisco 350 or 
something like that. I've tested d-link, planet and linksys here and 
they've worked fine but i just want to know your opinion about this. maybe 
other radios ? maybe other antennas ? maybe other zones' links structure ? 
maybe not putting the omni but lot's of  VAGI's and radios ?

Btw, i thinks 802.11g isn't a good options as it's designed for small 
links. Also, if having about 16 kbytes per user, a 11 mbps link is more 
than enough. I know for future it would be a good choice but now it's too 
expensive.






--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to