Judd: Yes, Everett has made some interesting posts on the list.
Yet that is not a license to gut and whitewash every ham operator with the same paint brush. That is what I was responding to. There is NO REASON that the part 15 hobbyists and hams cannot get along... and in fact they do. I saw no reason for Everett's lashing out at ham radio. As to him being inactive... he doesn't appear active in the hobby. Many hams hold their license long after they have died.... but doesn't mean they are active (and yes, I'm not kidding.... Everett was right about one thing... the FCC is screwed up but I still wouldn't mess with them as they still do enforce the law, abiet spotty). Lets move on. Jeff King, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/11/2003 On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:42:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Jeff, > >Everett seems to be bringing some good information and knowledge to >the list. How about we try to give him a little break? > >BTW, maybe you should do a little more investigation. From the link >you posted, he appears to be "active" and expiration in 2011. > >Thanks, Judd (minus-the-Ham-extra-cheese) > >P.S. Try not to take such offense to Ham comments. Most of us >looking from the outside in, can see that he wasn't saying all ham's >are bad or think differently. He was more referring to the holster- >sniffers. > >P.S.S. I'm sorry if my post has offended any holster-sniffers. > >Jeff King wrote: > >>>do some investigative work. >> >>I did. Here is your information: >> >>http://www.qrz.com/detail/KC6TCM >> >>You appear to be a retired, inactive, Technician class operator. -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
