Casey Halverson writes: > I highly suggest you take a look at the document I wrote some time ago: > > http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/InterpretingFccRegulations > > This is a accurate, legal interpretation of the rules, in a usable > reference format.
Not quite. The FCC doesn't care about EIRP per se. It cares about antenna gain (you tell them) and power into the back of the antenna. > Maybe SWN should make a giant poster for everone's walls :) perhaps SWN should get it correct first. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ivan Bojer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:13 PM > > To: Patrick Leary; Wireless > > Subject: RE: [BAWUG] Vivato and FCC part 15 > > > > > > Now it makes much more sense! Can you maybe confirm if > > cap for all other P2P systems is 36dBm EIRP according to > > current FCC regulations? > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- "Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." -- Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963) -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
