Hmm

- On your first example with the STA, most of the low cost radios do not have very 
good RX levels so the increases power from the AP
would help increase the reach in some cases and with the better RX levels on our 
radios this helps hear the TX from the remotes
better. Again the system needs to be setup correctly but there any many times where 
the higher power will help. 

- Next "Larger beam widths invite more interference", yes if not setup correct. But 
assuming you need to cover 120* and assuming
there is interface, a higher power radio using a lower gain antenna will HELP a setup 
like this, because less noise gain from the
antenna that reaches the RX of the radio and balancing the system. Again its all about 
the design.

- Also I agree a higher gain radio does reduce the total EIRP, but this not a bad 
thing. For example a 300mW radio can have a max
antenna gain of 15.6dBi which works out very good for the example I listed below. 
Again I am not saying use a 300mW radio all the
time which is why we also have 100mW and 200mW again adding more tools to what people 
need AND are able to design system correctly.

- One last point the high power radios fill a void where many people are using AMPS 
and do no need to, these radios offer a lower
cost solutions to fill the void.

Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider 
Office: 908-996-7995 Fax: 908-847-0202
http://www.demarctech.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BAWUG] RE: 300mw?


On Apr 13, 2004, at 10:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jim
>
> I agree with you on a basic setup but if a system is engineered 
> correctly, its very easy to have a balanced systems.

Note that the example I gave was about an AP with associated STAs.   I 
assumed that the common case would be laptop/pda/phone like clients, unable (or 
unwilling) to support the 300/400mW cards, for a
variety of 
reasons, including exposure limits.   Therefore, the link will be 
greatly unbalanced.

> The main benefit to a 300mW/400mW (soon) radio is a lower gain antenna 
> thus a larger vertical beam width at the base station, this is NOT the 
> best setup for all applications but it does add additional options to 
> the WISP tool box.

Larger beamwidths invite more interference.

You've also missed my point.   First a couple of assumtions:

1) antennas with gains greater than 30dBi are for our purposes, too large to be 
practical.
2) People will adhere the FCC rules, (even if they don't have the system certified 
with the antenna and pigtails they're using, but
I
digress.)

Check this out.

                     mW         dBm    max dBi ptmp             max dBi ptp       EIRP
                     1000.0     30.0       6.00                               6.00     
 36.00
                     794.33     29.0       7.00                               9.00     
 38.00
                     630.96     28.0       8.00                              
        12.00      40.00
                     501.19     27.0       9.00                             15.00      
42.00
                     398.11     26.0      10.00                             18.00      
44.00
                     316.23     25.0      11.00                             21.00      
46.00
                     251.19     24.0      12.00                             24.00      
48.00
                     199.53     23.0      13.00                             27.00      
50.00
                     158.49     22.0      14.00                             30.00      
52.00
                     125.89     21.0      15.00
                     100.00     20.0      16.00
                      79.43     19.0      17.00
                      63.10     18.0      18.00
                      50.12     17.0      19.00
                      39.81     16.0      20.00
                      31.62     15.0      21.00
                      25.12     14.0      22.00
                      19.95     13.0      23.00
                      15.85     12.0      24.00
                      12.59     11.0      25.00
                      10.00     10.0      26.00
                       7.94     9.00      27.00
                       6.31     8.00      28.00
                       5.01     7.00      29.00
                       3.98     6.00      30.00

Note that when running ptp, the allowed EIRP is higher for the lower power card.

> Also aesthetics comes in to play many times where a small, clean 
> looking device unit is the only option, again the radio gain can be 
> the difference between a link working or not.

#include <something about sacrificing performance for asthetics.h>

(and I do actually agree with you when it becomes the primary concern).

> Some of this may be outside the decision of this list but there are 
> valid reasons for these designs.

Actually, so far, it all seems to be on-topic to me.

> Sincerely, Tony Morella
> Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
> Office: 908-996-7995 Fax: 908-847-0202 http://www.demarctech.com
>

_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to