Please take me off your email list... Thanks...
Ken -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ken Martell Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] SLAC Computing Services (SCS) Network Specialist office:650 926-3804 fax:650 926-3329 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wireless Digest, Vol 2, Issue 30 Send wireless mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of wireless digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Cisco AP350 - Configuration issue??? (Tom Balon) 2. Re: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW (MULTACH, JEFF (SBC-OPS)) 3. Re: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW (j debert) 4. RE: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW (Dave Holmes-Kinsella) 5. Re: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW (j debert) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:12:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Balon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [BAWUG] Cisco AP350 - Configuration issue??? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Forgive me if this has been covered before, I've been off this list for a while. I recently upgraded a Cisco AP350 to IOS. The upgrade worked without a hitch. The unit came up just fine running the new IOS release. The unit was set to factory defaults. (Cisco states the upagrade to IOS cannot be undone. Once converted from VxWorks, the unit is forever bound to IOS.) Since then, I have been unable to maintain any associations to clients running Orinoco cards. These are the same cards and that worked great before. The log on the AP350 keeps showing clients loosing their association due to excessive retries. Cisco cards do better, but still have issues. In short, clients are constantly loosing their association due to excessive retries (both cisco and orinoco). Diagnostics for the clients show the AP sending RTS packets even when RTS is set to it's maximum. I tried setting it to zero, it still sends RTS packets. There are tons of retries. The cards always seem to fallback to 1Mbs rate. Last night, I tried again, flashing with the latest 12.2(15) IOS release. Set to derfaults. Same thing. Netstumber shows the AP available then un-available, sometimes for long periods of time. I've tried swapping antennas. Setting to long headers, turning off cisco extensions, raising max retries. In short, a week of trial and error. In the end, I put a BR-500 in and was up and running in no time, without any issues. So, what am I missing here ? Are others out there in the same boat as me with their AP350's running IOS ? One person I spoke with said they have the same issue with all their 350's after upgrading to IOS. Now I see where Cisco has discontinued support for the AP350. These issues only appeared *after* the upgrade to IOS. -T __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:39:52 -0500 From: "MULTACH, JEFF (SBC-OPS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" John Foust wrote: > SBC also makes it easy to re-admin the device: on this unit from SBC > Wisconsin, the admin password is the customer's street address, minus > the spaces and punctuation. That may be a local convention for technician installation of the product. It is not the standard way these units are installed and is not universal at SBC. These units are normally self installed by the customers and the customers are prompted to create their admin password. j debert wrote: > In this area of CA I have not seen many "2Wire" AP's with WEP on. WEP is on by default with all 2Wire equipment shipped from SBC. The WEP is unique per box with the default value printed on the bottom of each unit. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:59:20 -0700 From: j debert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 06:39, MULTACH, JEFF (SBC-OPS) wrote: > j debert wrote: > > > In this area of CA I have not seen many "2Wire" AP's with WEP on. > > WEP is on by default with all 2Wire equipment shipped from SBC. The > WEP is unique per box with the default value printed on the bottom of > each unit. Which probably explains why they have all gone "green" now. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:32:56 -0700 From: "Dave Holmes-Kinsella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [BAWUG] Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW To: "'j debert'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hmm.., perhaps I'm unlucky: there are two 2wire Aps within spitting distance of my house, but they're both WEP-enabled, it seems. Curse the digerati. On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 06:39, MULTACH, JEFF (SBC-OPS) wrote: > j debert wrote: > > > In this area of CA I have not seen many "2Wire" AP's with WEP on. > > WEP is on by default with all 2Wire equipment shipped from SBC. The > WEP is unique per box with the default value printed on the bottom of > each unit. Which probably explains why they have all gone "green" now. _______________________________________________ BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:48:01 -0700 From: j debert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 08:59, j debert wrote: > Which probably explains why they have all gone "green" now. > (btw, "green" is meant in the intel/military sense--that communication is "secure". So in this note, it means WEP is enabled.) ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless End of wireless Digest, Vol 2, Issue 30 *************************************** _______________________________________________ BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
