piu' che ath9k sembra un problema ath9k + hostap.... stiamo a vedere come evolvono le cose.
2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> > si ho gia' aperto un bug da tempo per il VAP > > ma sembra che al momento e' proprio al modalita' AP che ha bisogno di > essere stabilizzata su ath9k dopo di che probabilmente aggiusteranno > anche i VAP > > 2011/3/23 Antonio Anselmi <tony.anse...@gmail.com>: > > funziona su M5... quello che manca e' la possibilita' di avere un > simultaneo > > VAP in managed :( > > > > > > 2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> From: Ben West <westbyw...@gmail.com> > >> Date: 2011/3/22 > >> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on > >> Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode? > >> To: "Daniel A. Nagy" <nagyd...@epointsystem.org> > >> Cc: olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org > >> > >> > >> For an update, I believe I was able to get HT modes working in IBSS > >> (aka adhoc) on two Nanostation M5s. The Links reported 150Mbit/s > >> connection on both ends after settling, and throughput measured at > >> 45Mbit/s. > >> This required patches to iw and compat-wireless on OpenWRT r25206. > >> More info here: > >> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299 > >> I would be interested to hear if anyone has been able to specify HT > >> modes in /etc/config/wireless on OpenWRT, since I was unable. > >> Note that the link speeds did suggest I was getting multiple chains > >> (i.e. MIMO) very briefly. My test environment (indoor room, 20feet > >> separation) could have been non-ideal. > >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Ben West <m...@benwest.name> wrote: > >> > > >> > Sorry for not explaining this in the original post. It is described > in > >> > OpenWRT forum post; I had snipped my question to this list to focus on > >> > mesh-related question. > >> > Gateway: Rocket M5, flashed with pre-compiled > >> > openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-rocket-m-squashfs-factory.bin for Backfire > 10.03-rc4 > >> > Repeaters (and a backup gwy): Nanostation M5, flashed with > >> > custom-compiled pre-compiled > openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin > >> > from Backfire r24045, and with this patch to allow DHCP on 2nd LAN > port: > >> > http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html > >> > Basically, I'm curious to hear details (e.g. patches, what revision of > >> > OpenWRT/ath9k) where people have confirmed getting HT modes to work. > >> > Besides that, these nodes are actually working just fine, and their > link > >> > speed generally outpaces the uplink I have for them anyway. It's just > that > >> > I would like to support ~40Mbit link speed in the intermediate future, > >> > should a fast enough uplink appear. > >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Daniel A. Nagy > >> > <nagyd...@epointsystem.org> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 03/14/2011 06:10 AM, Ben West wrote: > >> >> > I just set up 3 Ubiquiti M5 devices as mesh nodes running OpenWRT > >> >> > >> >> Since Ubiquiti M5 devices are not as identical as the pre-M series, > >> >> could you be more specific? > >> >> > >> >> These three categories are quite distinct, require different firmware > >> >> and have their own, distinct quirks: > >> >> - PicoStation / Bullet M5 > >> >> - NanoStation M5 > >> >> - NanoStation M5 Loco > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Daniel > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Olsr-users mailing list > >> >> olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org > >> >> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Ben West > >> westbyw...@gmail.com > >> > >> -- > >> Olsr-users mailing list > >> olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org > >> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wireless mailing list > >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org > >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless