How are WISPs self-regulated? -Charles
------------------------------------------- WISPNOG Park City, UT http://www.wispnog.com August 15-17, 2005 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:21 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected toofficially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday I feel that we are kind of self regulated, where as the "big boys", when left unregulated, go crazy. Charles Wu wrote: ><snip> >If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I >would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from >customer to carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it... </snip> > >So here's the caveat... > >If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC >rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents > >You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a >super-mesh network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems >now come w/ WiFi access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's >a convenience to the consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an >"insidious method" of trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) > >-Charles > >------------------------------------------- >WISPNOG Park City, UT >http://www.wispnog.com >August 15-17, 2005 > > > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
