Charles,
Well thats exactly what I had in my 3650 comments. I'm uploading today
after proof reading. I recommend that others also send in comments of the
same nature to support 3650 as a WISP small copetitive ISP band.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 11:41 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Fw: [isp-clec]FCC&DSL-WBIA
ACTIONRecommendation
<snip>
Yes, the BELLs are AWARE of WISPs. Exactly why we need to protect the use of
the Spectrum for our own special interests.
</snip>
Perhaps a better method of lobbying would be to influence the 3650 band for
Form 477 registered independent / small ISPs / CLECs / WISPs
In the broadcast world...there are limits to how many radio stations / TV
stations one should own
A regulated, open and semi coordinated WISP band (3650 & 700) where
companies (or subsidiaries) w/ significant monopoly assets for that
particular market are denied access (e.g., if you own the copper / cable
plant in that town, you can't use it, but if you don't, you can) might be
the way to go
Thoughts?
-Charles
-------------------------------------------
WISPNOG Park City, UT
http://www.wispnog.com
August 15-17, 2005
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 8/4/2005
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
