I find bits to be more useful simply because we sell packages based around bits (1.5Mbit, 3Mbit, 10Mbit, etc). Graphing in bits lets me look at the graphs and quickly determine the amount of throughput a given user or link is getting in relation to what I sold them. If it were graphed in bytes I would have to think about it for a minute and do some math.

--
Aubrey Wells
AirInfinite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o: (404) 601.1407
f: (404) 601.1408
c: (770) 356.9767



Brian Rohrbacher wrote:

Ok, so I have got it working.  Should I graph bytes or bits?

Brian


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to