|
The only good, if there is one, for Trango using different OID for the RSSI is that I believe you can get the slave RSSI from the master. Now, I would agree, there should be a common path to the RSSI in the 2 devices and there should be an additional path in the master to get the slave value.
Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Nigel Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:47:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc. > >I could be mis-remembering this, or confusing things (say, a tower where > >we replaced a 5800 with a 5830 or vice-versa), and if I'm wrong I'll cop > >to it. But I truly believe, with religious fervor and zeal, that Trango > >has changed their MIBs with different point releases of the firmware. > > I can't comment on Trango changing a MIB, but the MIBs have > peculiarities such as different OIDs for the Master and Slave > units for the same parameter. So the OID for RSSI is different > for each end of the PtP link. That's just bad MIB design IMHO. > > -- > Nigel. > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ ------- End of Original Message ------- |
-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
