Title: Message
>you are right it is not 'scatter' it called dispersion and diffraction, Mr. Wu.
 
don't forget ATTENUATION =)
 
-Charles

-------------------------------------------
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wallace
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2006 04:41 PM
>To: ''WISPA General List''
>Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
>
>Trees are sponges -- there is no "scatter" with them
>
>That said, you're are causing yourself undue headache trying to do NLoS with
>2.4 -- especially when 900 MHz is readily available
>
>-Charles
>
>-------------------------------------------
>CWLab
>Technology Architects
>http://www.cwlab.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Paul Hendry
>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:44 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
>
>
>Ola everybody,
>
> I hope everyone had a great Christmas and New Year and are all ready
>for 2006, the year of the WISP :)
> When I have setup wireless in an area it has always depended on the
>Geographic's of the area as to if we deploy 2.4GHz or 5GHz and I have always
>decided that 2.4 should be used where NLOS could be an issue. This decision
>has always been based on the fact that the lower frequency will pass through
>trees a lot easier however I have recently read a white paper that suggests
>otherwise. Basically the document says that the higher the frequency, the
>better the scatter (the ability to bounce of and around objects). It also
>says that 5GHz is better at penetrating walls.
> So my question is, have I been basing some of our deployments on
>false information or am I missing something here? I know that in tests I
>have seen a more stable signal at 2.4GHz in a NLOS environment but is this
>just a fluke?
>
>Cheers,
>
>P.
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.11/219 - Release Date: 02/01/2006
>
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to