Surely, unless the bandwidth at the switch port is a bottle neck then traffic will not get buffered/queued on the switch and QoS will not come into play??
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John J. Thomas Sent: 30 March 2006 06:53 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation Generally, you want QOS classifying as close the edges as you can get it. Then you want your switches to honor the TOS/COS tags, then you want your edge router to police/queue/fragment to your upstream. John >-----Original Message----- >From: Rick Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:09 AM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation > >I can't see how having a QOS switch could hurt...with VOIP, QOS in as >many places >as possible can only help... > >Paul Hendry wrote: > >>Is the switch likely to be the bottle neck in your network? Surely you want >>QoS enabled routers where bandwidth isn't plentiful. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of George >>Sent: 29 March 2006 03:50 >>To: WISPA General List >>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Switch Recomendation >> >>Thanks matt and larry. >>I have a 2512 procurve that we like and a Dell switch as well. >> >>Who makes the Dell switches for Dell? >> >>Guess what I really want is to make sure that those little voice packets >>get the priority :) >> >>George >> >>Matt Liotta wrote: >> >> >>>We've found that you don't really need a QoS capable switch. What is >>>more important is for the appropriate COS and TOS bits to be set by the >>>VoIP device(s) in question and have a switch capable of "doing the right >>>thing" with those packets. Every enterprise grade switch we have looked >>>at seems to do the right thing when the bits are set. We've been happy >>>with Dell switchs for example. >>> >>>-Matt >>> >>>George Rogato wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I need a recommendation for a 12 port switch that handles a high >>>>amount of packet per second and has qos for voip. >>>>Cost isn't an issue. >>>> >>>>Anyone have a suggestion? >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>>George >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >-- >WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
