Blair What price points are you looking at for this setup? For now we are looking at these more for a back haul where you can get 2.4Ghz into a an area that is otherwise hard to reach. We are working on a 900Mhz CPE design also and hope to have is ready by Q2 using a lower cost design but still need to do more testing.
Sincerely, Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 http://www.demarctech.com This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete all copies of this communication -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair Davis Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:27 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 cards...... Tony, I hope so. However, I am running out of time. Let me give you a little background. I have a 2.4GHz system running that covers most of my county. It is a mixture of 802.11 and TurboCell. The TurboCell provides back haul and service for long range clients, (>3 miles), or for NLoS clients at short range. I use the 802.11 for short range, LoS clients (<3 miles). This has worked well for us in the past, but, the increasing bandwidth demands are overloading our TurboCell back hauls, increasing noise levels are decreasing the usable range of our 802.11 AP's, (in one area we no longer deploy 802.11 CPE's at all, just TurboCell). I am now deploying a 5.8GHz Netstream system to replace my TurboCell back hauls. I am also looking into polled systems on 2.4GHz to replace my TurboCell CPE's and AP's. Netstream is my most likely choice here as well, but I am open to other polled systems on 2.4GHz as well. I have one PtP link using TurboCell with RF Linx 915UDC units to get thru a severe NLoS for a single user. This was a very expensive deployment and the average customer would not pay for it. I tested several 900MHz systems and found them wanting before settling on the RF Linx UDC's.. I now have several subdivisions, heavily tree infested, that want service. They will not accept large towers and antennas on each home, but they will accept a single large tower to serve the entire subdivision, so a 900MHz or less system for local distribution is the only reasonable option I can come up with. None of the existing 900MHz systems I have looked at will both provide 360deg coverage and adequate tree penetration using a single AP, and I can not justify 6 60deg AP's for a subdivision that might have 20 sign-ups total. Netstream using SR9 cards seems tailor made for this. Based on the expected ship dates for the SR9, I was expecting to begin testing the SR9/Netstream system in the next week or so and begin deployment by the end of this month. Now, it looks like I won't even be able to start testing until the end of May. Even getting a pair of the cards to begin testing with would ease my pain and that of the eagerly waiting customers.... I am really getting up against the wall here. My time is running out and I must find my answer soon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Blair > >We have received samples and the cards are working well, UB wanted to make >sure these radios are 100% before releasing 900Mhz is much more difficult >then 2.4 or even 5Ghz. It will be worth the wait. > >Sincerely, Tony Morella >Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider >Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 >http://www.demarctech.com > >This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the >meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its >disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of >this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged >material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone >other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the >confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or >distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete all >copies of this communication > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Blair Davis >Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 4:56 PM >To: WISPA General List >Subject: [WISPA] SR9 cards...... > >It seems that the delivery date on the SR9 cards from Ubiquiti Networks is >now the 2nd week of May.... > >It was first of the year, then March, then April, now May.... > >Can you say 'vaporware'? > > >-- >Blair Davis > >AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240 > >West Michigan Wireless ISP >269-686-8648 > >A division of: >Camp Communication Services, INC > >-- >WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/