If you want USF money, you will have to start charging/collecting USF money.

Disagree. We already pay it on our downstreams any way.
Its about benefiting consumers not benefiting providers. USF helps get services to consumers. Giving part of the money to WISPs, help serve more consumers more efficiently so more consumers can be served. There is a clear benefit of allowing WISPs to receive funds, regardless of wether they pay in. The small miniscule amount a WISP would pay in today is next to nothing. Percentage of market owned by WISPs way less than .1%, to small to record.

Tom DeReggi



If you want E-Rate, learn the system, get a SPIN number, suck up to the Board of Education, and get some E-Rate projects. (You won't win it with the lowest bid alone. No one wants to change the status quo). If you want more unlicensed spectrum, what will you do for the FCC or the PSTN or the SYSTEM?

This list complained loudly and publicly about filling out the required Broadband subscriber forms.
What will you do when you are filling out 499/499a forms?
What about when you have to make your USF payments on a timely, quarterly basis, but the system won't accept payments under $1000?
(Plus that 11% fee will not help your lowest price system of selling).

That's my 2 cents. Be careful out there. They eat their young.

Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc.



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to