If you want USF money, you will have to start charging/collecting USF
money.
Disagree. We already pay it on our downstreams any way.
Its about benefiting consumers not benefiting providers. USF helps get
services to consumers.
Giving part of the money to WISPs, help serve more consumers more
efficiently so more consumers can be served.
There is a clear benefit of allowing WISPs to receive funds, regardless of
wether they pay in. The small miniscule amount a WISP would pay in today is
next to nothing. Percentage of market owned by WISPs way less than .1%, to
small to record.
Tom DeReggi
If you want E-Rate, learn the system, get a SPIN number, suck up to the
Board of Education, and get some E-Rate projects. (You won't win it with
the lowest bid alone. No one wants to change the status quo).
If you want more unlicensed spectrum, what will you do for the FCC or the
PSTN or the SYSTEM?
This list complained loudly and publicly about filling out the required
Broadband subscriber forms.
What will you do when you are filling out 499/499a forms?
What about when you have to make your USF payments on a timely, quarterly
basis, but the system won't accept payments under $1000?
(Plus that 11% fee will not help your lowest price system of selling).
That's my 2 cents. Be careful out there. They eat their young.
Regards,
Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/