Thanks guys, This info was what I was looking for, and it substantiates what I believe.  I need to take this info to my investors, so they understand what we are up against.

Ron wallace

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2006 04:54 AM
>To: ''WISPA General List''
>Subject: RE: [WISPA] Navini Networks, was no subject
>
>Systems work differently when operating under licensed vs. unlicensed bands
>
>That said, no amount of "fancing beamforming" or signal processing or even
>complex QAM modulation will bust through that -70ish noise floor
>
>-Charles
>
>-------------------------------------------
>CWLab
>Technology Architects
>http://www.cwlab.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of George Rogato
>Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:45 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Navini Networks, was no subject
>
>
>Hi Ron
>I don't know much except what has come across these list since the stuff
>came out.
>I seem to recall a couple of wisps saying they've installed them and
>being successful. I don't recall that they were very fast at all.
>
>Some of the municipalities have deployed them, I think maybe Portland
>Oregon and Seattle Washington have them.
>
>And I think it was relatively expensive, Think I heard like 30-60k or
>more per pop. Big wind loaded multiple panel antennas of size and
>expensive omni's
>
>George
>
>Ron Wallace wrote:
>> George,
>>
>> What do you know about them?
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:29 PM
>> >To: 'WISPA General List'
>> >Subject: Re: [WISPA] (no subject)
>> >
>> >Ron Wallace wrote:
>> >> To All,
>> >>
>> >> Any one know anthing about Navini Networks and all their claims?
>> sounds >> too good to be true. >>
>> >> Ron Wallace
>> >>
>> >
>> >I'd like to know as well how it performs and their success rate. It's
>> >been out awhile now.
>> >
>> >I do know that Navini and Vivato were supposed to be revolutionary
>> >products using smart antennas and direction beam forming techniques to
>> >overcome nlos and reach in deeper to the customer.
>> >They get to use more power than a normal PtMP unlicensed system.
>> >Vivato didn't make it: http://www.vivato.com/ VIVATO ANNOUNCES WIND DOWN
>> >PLANS.
>> >
>> >George
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> >
>> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> >
>>
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to