I think it interesting that item number 3 is left out or twisted.
1. is engaged in providing wire or electronic communication switching
service OR
2. is engaged in providing wire or electronic communication transmission
service AND
3. the Commission finds that such service is a replacement for a substantial
portion of the local telephone exchange service AND
4. the Commission finds that it is in the public interest to deem such a
person or entity to be a telecommunications carrier for purposes of CALEA.
I don't see the average small isp that brett is talking about EVER becoming
a "...replacement for a substantial portion of the local telephone
exchange". That clause alone would seem to exclude all but the largest
isp's.
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 9:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Scope of the CALEA order
In response to Brett Glass, Susan Crawford explains the Scope of the CALEA
Order
http://scrawford.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/9/2095565.html
Susan Crawford is Assistant Professor of Law at Cardozo Law School,
teaching cyberlaw and intellectual property law.
--
Regards,
Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
