Travis Johnson wrote:
I'd like to go back to the specs on different radios just so I can
compare for myself...
5Mbps auto ratio
8 non-overlapping channels
10mhz spectrum per channel
-90 Receive level
15 mile range (without a grid)
External connector and dual-pol integrated antenna
$879 AP (WISP price)
$479 SU (WISP price)
Canopy 2.4ghz (regular):
7Mbps fixed ratio
3 non-overlapping channels
20mhz spectrum per channel
-86 Receive level
2.4 canopy has a -89 receive level
I am guessing your quoting single prices here. Now that maybe viable
for this discussion but realistically if a WISP is not financially able
to purchase in 25 packs they likely are very underfunded. So that the
information is available a 25 pack of the "Classic" 2.4 ghz Canopy units
is $6709 so if you break that down to single price that is about $269ea
+ $50 for reflector for a total of $319ea.
http://www.doubleradius.com It is possible to get them cheaper then
this but you will have to deal with co-op's or ebay.com
Also I would never install a unit with a 60* pattern (Trango or
Canopy). Just include the$50 for a reflector or stinger from
5 mile range (without a dish)
$902 AP (reseller price online)
$490 SU (reseller price online)
This is where GPS sync comes in. You can point two different tower
locations on the same frequency at each other and they will not
interfere with each other. This is how it is possible to do a 6 AP
cluster on one tower with only 3 non overlapping channels.
Based on the information from Mike, I could not use Canopy. In several
areas, I have 4-5 towers located within 5 miles of each other.... how
do I do that with Canopy? With Trango, I use a different channel for
the sector pointing toward another tower (frequency planning and
coordination is very important) and everything works great. Is there a
solution for this with Canopy?
Remember with Canopy you generally don't have to avoid interference.
Find the cleanest channel and 90% of the time you will be the few db
louder then the noise that you need to make a viable link.
Also, by using only a 10mhz spectrum per channel, Trango's channel 1
and channel 8 are actually outside the reach of Canopy and 802.11 (for
the most part) and thus can almost always be used in a noisy environment.
Mike Bushard, Jr wrote:
Well, so far as we can tell the only thing that can kill canopy, IS CANOPY.
We have put it up against WaveRider, Alvarion, and 802.11b. They all fell of
the face of the earth.
We have 16 tower sites deployed, all 900Mhz and 2.4, over 1000 CPE and more
on the way. (I realize there are many people bigger than us.)
We use a mix of MTI Omni's, MTI or Tiltek 120deg Sectors (MTI for Horizontal
and Tiltek for Vertical) and integrated 60deg sectors (I really wish someone
would come out with a descent H-pol as I don't like the integrated antenna)
with 900. Cyclone Omni's or 120deg sectors on 2.4.
Here is what I have found with GPS Sourced Sync vs. Generate Sync:
If you want channel reuse you need GPS sourced sync.
If you have a tower more than 8 miles away, you need to use different
channels no matter what, even with GPS sourced sync you still have speed of
light issues from tower to tower.
Can you Generate sync and deploy multiple AP's in a given area, yes. You
just need to make sure you have Frequency separation. Does this mean I
recommend it, NO.
Also even with every site GPS Synced, you still can only put so many AP's in
a given area be for you need to go to a different polarity. At least we know
there will never be another 900Mhz based ISP in one of our towns.....
Also on a side note, I have never found a problem with 2.4, it is 900 that
will give you problems, it just carries so far. If the noise floor was
lower, and Canopy could run at -90 we would have coverage for a long ways.
It seems like we can always pick up a AP at -80.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 5:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] vendor specs -- Jon
Patrick Leary wrote:
I'd be interested in further explanation on this topic. We have some
Canopy pmp and haven't found the lack of GPS a problem. Granted we don't
have a large amount of pmp, but I would certainly like to understand any
future pain before we experience it.
I'm speaking about multipoint matt, not ptp. The dedicated ptp you are
doing is by far the exception. Canopy is designed, built, and sold to be
primarily a pmp system. I've never met or heard of a Canopy pmp network
of any scale that did not require GPS.
WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org