In this particular situation the client (tenant) was owner of both ends
(base station and CPE) I think. Correct me if I am wrong. I seem to
remember reading that the airline wanted a private WiFi network for
themselves. The airport (landlord) was trying to prevent this. In this
type of a situation I think OTARD would apply regardless of the type of
In the event of a base station where a third party ISP is the
beneficiary of use of a base station OTARD right of access would still
not apply. I welcome feedback, corrections, rebuttals here. Truth is I
know little about this but think I would like to know more. If anyone
else has knowledge of this particular case and can add more
enlightenment it is much appreciated.
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) And I run my own wisp!
188.8.131.52 (net meeting)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Harold Bledsoe"
To: "WISPA General List" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] OTARD
Fascinating. I had always read OTARD to only cover client devices and
not base station devices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] OTARD
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING REGARDING THE
OVER-THE-AIR RECEPTION DEVICES (OTARD) RULES. Found that Massport's
restrictions on Continental's use of its Wi-Fi antenna are pre-empted by
the OTARD rules and therefore granted Continental's petition. (Dkt No.
05-247). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/17/2006 by MO&O. (FCC
No. 06-157). OET
WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org