Clients were based on both Senao radio CPEs and Zinwell CPEs
On 11/8/06, Lonnie Nunweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are the brands of the client units? They might very well have the same gear inside which could account for the similar behaviour. Lonnie On 11/8/06, rabbtux rabbtux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I've seen this situation now several times, and wonder if someone on > the list has an explaination for it. Last week we took down one of > our APs (802.11b) for several hours to replace it with a new one. We > ran into some issues and had to fall back to using the original > system. We brought up the original system after being down for 3 or 4 > hours. > > Of the 25 subs, 4 or 5 CPEs did not re-associate with the AP. All > was cleared up when customers called & were instructed to recycle > power to outdoor CPEs. This situation happened to 3 different types > of CPEs that we have in the field for this AP. > > Is there something fundamental in the 802.11b specification that I am > missing? Has anyone else seen this before? I'm now ready to replace > the AP with the new equipment, but worry that I'll have CPE > re-association issues again if off-line for too long (2-4 hours?). > > Thanks for your replies, > Marshall > -- > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- Lonnie Nunweiler Valemount Networks Corporation http://www.star-os.com/ -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
