I just heard about a local Virginia WISP who used the OTARD rule to site a
Has anyone else used this ruling to apply to Wireless Broadband where a
tower is placed on a property owner's land and then service offered to the
property owner on a secondary basis?
I see various writeups on the topic on the 'net, but can't find one that
specifically differentiates between the siting of an "antenna" versus a
"tower" with and antenna on it.
Kelly Shaw
Pure Internet, Inc.
WISPA Wireless List:



Reply via email to