Brian:
Amateur Radio processes was one of the mental models I used in my
proposal. You were right on in noting the similarities.
Thanks,
Steve (N8GNJ)
On Feb 8, 2007, at Feb 8 09:55 AM, Brian Webster wrote:
Steve,
What you are suggesting here is very similar to what the ham radio
community does now. I would add a step in your process, that first the
offending WISP be contacted via official WISPA correspondence
explaining
what it is we are doing and the planned course of action through
the FCC and
give them a chance to correct the problems voluntarily. That's what
the hams
do and many times that works. If this process were to work, we might
actually get recognition from the FCC as a monitor for this purpose.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Writing about BWIA again! - www.bwianews.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
