----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Leary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:52:51 -0900
Subject:
RE: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.


> Yes, but that's with the self-install indoor CPE, right? Nothing
> outdoors except the wilderness :)
> 

Nothing like keeping me honest Patrick :-) Thanks. We are testing in diverse 
areas and due to the need for self install primarily, it's the indoor CPE.

-Dee




> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of W.D.McKinney
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:46 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.
> 
> As soon as I can this info, I will answer these questions Scriv. So far
> we 
> we only see 1.5M for coverage with the current rev of software.
> 
> -Dee
> 
> 
> Alaska Wireless Systems
> 1(907)240-2183 Cell
> 1(907)349-2226 Fax
> 1(907)349-4308 Office
> www.akwireless.net
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Scrivner
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: WISPA General List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:54:52 -0900
> Subject:
> Re: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.
> 
> 
> > So can we get some real world data on how well it is working? Is the 
> > terrain flat? Wooded? What kind of coverage area are you seeing? Power
> 
> > levels up and down? Speeds up and down per client? Maximum CPE per 
> > sector currently? Bandwidth used per sector?  Is this 802.16 "d" or
> "e"? 
> > FDD or TDD? Can you tell I have a few questions about WiMax?
> > Scriv
> > 
> > 
> > W.D.McKinney wrote:
> > 
> > >We have BreezeMax 2.3GHz up and running here now :-)
> > >
> > >-Dee
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Marlon K. Schafer
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: WISPA General List
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:31:57 -0900
> > >Subject:
> > >Re: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >>I wonder where the heck the idea that WiMax has a stronger signal
> than
> > wifi.
> > >>
> > >>Clearly these guys are talking about licensed vs. unlicensed wimax
> eh?
> > >>
> > >>laters,
> > >>marlon
> > >>
> > >>----- Original Message ----- 
> > >>From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> > >>Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:40 AM
> > >>Subject: [WISPA] Another expert heard from.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>All,
> > >>>
> > >>>I ran across this article and found it quite amusing.
> > >>>
> > >>>As quoted from the article;
> > >>>
> > >>>"Newtowne Court public housing, chosen for its proximity to public 
> > >>>buildings and its high percentage of school-age children, is
> already 
> > >>>equipped with 20 to 30 antennae for WiFi, said Hart. Hart said the
> > project
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>>is being stalled because the 20 to 30 antennae aren't strong
> enough.
> > >>>
> > >>>The next step for the city is to implement so-called WiMax, a
> stronger 
> > >>>signal that will someday provide mobile wireless connectivity
> without a 
> > >>>base station antenna.
> > >>>
> > >>>"The technology today doesn't penetrate walls very well; leaves can
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>even 
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>get in its way because it's a radio signal," said Hart. "Right
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>behind this 
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>technology is WiMax. Nobody's selling that yet but it's so close to
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>taking 
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >>>over WiFi, it's holding up a lot of projects." "
> > >>>
> > >>>Link to full article below;
> > >>>http://www.townonline.com/cambridge/homepage/8998949105128439806
> > >>>
> > >>>Regards,
> > >>>Dawn DiPietro
> > >>>-- 
> > >>>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >>>
> > >>>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > >>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >>>
> > >>>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
> > >>>      
> > >>>
> > >>-- 
> > >>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >>
> > >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > >>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >>
> > >>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > -- 
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > 
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > 
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> > 
> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses(190).
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses(42).
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to